The Harlan Institute-ConSource Virtual Supreme Court Competition
The Harlan Institute has partnered with The Constitutional Sources Project (ConSource) to host the inaugural Virtual Supreme Court competition. This competition offers teams of two high school students the opportunity to research cutting-edge constitutional law, write persuasive appellate briefs, argue against other students through video chats, and try to persuade a panel of esteemed attorneys during oral argument that their side is correct. This year the competition focuses on Fisher v. University of Texas.
Resolved: Is the Fourteenth Amendment Color-Blind?
Monday, April 22, 2013
Introduction: 10:15-11:20 EDT
Josh Blackman, The Harlan Institute
Championship Round: 10:20-1045
Team 1 (Petitioner – Fisher) v. Team 2 (Respondent – Texas)
Team 1 (Petitioner): DJ Anderson & Jason Parson (Frisco CTE Center, Frisco, Texas)
Team 2 (Respondent): Sarah Sietmann, Konnor Rodriguez (Frisco CTE Center, Frisco, Texas)
Judges:
- Tom Krattenmaker
- Matthew Fitzgerald
- Julie Silverbrook, Executive Director of ConSource
-
Petitioner-Anderson (5 minutes)
-
Respondent-Sietmann (5 minutes)
-
Petitioner-Parson, Rebuttal (3 minutes)
-
Respondent- Rodriguez, Rebuttal (3 minutes)
Runner-Up Round:10:45-11:10
Team 1 (Petitioner – Fisher) v. Team 2 (Respondent – Texas)
Team 1 (Petitioner): Katie Gibson, Amber Decker (Sioux Central High School, Sioux Rapids, Iowa)
Team 2 (Respondent): Baylee Hammonds and D. Wiggins (Frisco CTE Center, Frisco, Texas)
Judges:
-
Petitioner 1 (5 minutes)
-
Respondent-Hammonds (5 minutes)
-
Petitioner 2 (3 minutes)
-
Respondent-Wiggins (3 minutes)
Concluding Remarks: 11:10-11:15
Julie Silverbrook, ConSource