In this post, I collect my responses to the government’s sur-reply in Texas v. United States.

1. Part 1: The Applicability of Youngstown (Jackson, J.) to DAPA
2. Part 2: The Scope of Injunction
3. Part 3: Narrowly Reading Massachusetts v. EPA
4. Part 4: Helped, Rather than Harmed, for Standing
5. Part 5: The Impact of States That Decline To Honor ICE Immigration Detainers
6. Part 6: How Big was President Bush’s Family Fairness Program of 1990?
7. Part 7: Government Responds to “Temporary Bridge” Argument
8. Part 8: The Secretary’s DAPA Framework Cannot Be The Exercise of Discretion
9. Part 9: The Case-By-Case Inquiry is A Façade
10. Part 10: DACA Denials for Discretionary Reasons?
11. Part 11: Who Bears The Burden for An Injunction?
12. Part 12: Explaining The President’s Statements on the Limits of Executive Power