Sep 21, 2012

Posted in Uncategorized

Scalia v. Posner, Rounds XI & XII: Did Posner Lie about Scalia citing legislative history in Heller?

And the beat(down) goes on. Following Rounds V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, and X,  this judicial blood-letting shows no sign of ceasing.

In Posner’s initial review of Scalia & Garner’s book in The New Republic, Posner chastised Scalia for citing legislative history in D.C. v. Heller.

Scalia is a pertinacious critic of the use of legislative history to illuminate statutory meaning; and one reason for his criticism is that a legislature is a hydra-headed body whose members may not share a common view of the interpretive issues likely to be engendered by a statute that they are considering enacting. But when he looks for the original meaning of eighteenth-century constitutional provisions—as he did in his opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller, holding that an ordinance forbidding people to own handguns even for the defense of their homes violated the Second Amendment—Scalia is doing legislative history.

Garner responded in kind, stating that Scalia did not cite legislative history in Heller:

 Judge Posner points to a supposed contradiction: that the book condemns the use of legislative history, yet “Scalia is doing legislative history when he looks for the original meaning of eighteenth-century constitutional provisions—as he did in his opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller.” Judge Posner knows very well that “legislative history” does not embrace what theHeller opinion used—the history of the times when the legislation (or constitutional provision) was adopted, including the understandings reflected in contemporaneous legislation and scholarly commentary. “Legislative history” means the floor debates, committee hearings, and committee reports of the legislature or convention that adopted or proposed the text in question. It was not the Court’s opinion in Heller but Justice Stevens’s dissent that used (and, we think, misread) the Second Amendment’s drafting history. Lawyers know the distinction, but Posner’s depiction of a contradiction where there is none, in a magazine directed to nonlawyers, preys on the unknowledgeable.

To this Posner replied:

Speaking of legislative history, Garner says that I “prey on the unknowledgeable” when I say that Justice Scalia was doing “legislative history” in his opinion that holds that the Second Amendment creates a right to own guns for personal self-defense (District of Columbia v. Heller). Garner defines legislative history more narrowly than I would, to mean only “drafting history”—but Scalia did discuss the amendment’s drafting history in his opinion and claimed that it supported his interpretation of the amendment.

Now, it’s Scalia’s turn to get in the mix. On Monday, during a wide-ranging interview with Scalia and Garner by Stephen Adler, Justice Scalia opined on Posner. When asked about Posner’s claim regarding legislative history (Adler does not quote from Posner’s article–see above for an accurate quotation), Scalia replies:

Only– only in writing for a non-legal audience could he have made that argument. Because any legal audience knows what legislative history is. It’s the history of the enactment of the bill. It’s the floor speeches.
It’s the prior drafts of committees. That’s what legislative history is. It isn’t the history of the times. It’s not what
people thought it meant immediately after its enactment.
It’s not what laws were– were continued in effect despite this. That– that is simply not legislative
history. And– and– and to say that I use legislative history in how– is– is simply, to put it bluntly, a lie. And–
you can get away with it in the New Republic I suppose, but– but– but (LAUGH) not– not to a legal audience

Justice Scalia did his best Joe Wilson impersonation, and said that Posner “lied” about Scalia citing legislative history in D.C. v. Heller.

At another event before the Federalist Society, Scalia had this to say about Posner’s legislative history charge:

What are your thoughts on the Richard Posner book review?

“I’m not going to get into this whole thing written for a glossy magazine.”

Okay, I will say this. It was misleading of Judge Posner to claim that I used “legislative history” in District of Columbia v. Heller, the landmark Second Amendment case. There’s a difference between considering “legislative history” — a legal term of art referring to the history of the enactment of a given provision, such as committee reports and floor statements and the like — and looking to the history of the time to get an understanding of how terms in a provision were understood.

Not to be outdone, Judge Posner put out a press release in response. Well it wasn’t really a press release, but I don’t know what else to call it. Reuters put out Posner’s remarks with this introduction:

Sept 20 (Reuters) - The following is the text of a response by Judge Richard Posner to comments by Justice Antonin Scalia in an interview with Reuters this week:

Reuters has invited me to respond to a statement made by Justice Scalia in an interview of him by Stephen Adler on September 17.

Here is the crux of Posner’s reply:

I had indicated what I meant by legislative history when I had said that in seeking the original eighteenth-century meaning of the text of the Second Amendment Justice Scalia had been doing legislative history. His quest for original meaning had taken him to a variety of English and American sources from which he distilled the existence of a common law right of armed self-defense that he argued had been codified in the Second Amendment.

He may not consider such a historical inquiry to be an exercise of “legislative history,” because he defines legislative history very narrowly (and in the interview calls it “garbage”). His coauthor, Bryan Garner, does not define it so. Here is the definition of the term in Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009), of which Garner is the editor: “The background and events leading to the enactment of a statute, including hearings, committee reports, and floor debates.” The “background and events leading to the enactment” of the Second Amendment are the focus of the Heller opinion.

Even if I accepted Scalia’s narrow definition of “legislative history” and applied it to his opinion in Heller, I would not be telling a “lie.” For Justice Scalia does discuss the “drafting history” (legislative history in its narrowest sense) of the Second Amendment. See 554 U.S. 598-599, 603-605.

So I would not have been lying, or even mistaken, had I said in my book review that in Heller Scalia “actually resorts” to “legislative history” in its narrowest sense (“drafting history”). But I did not say that.

Oooohhh….citations to Heller. So what is on pages 598-599 and 603-605 of Volume 554 of the U.S. Reports (I haven’t looked at Heller in years!):

On pages 598-599, Scalia discusses the debate that led to the Second Amendment in order to explain the “relationship between prefatory clause and operative clause”  (boy, does that make me feel nostalgic for Supreme Court cases that have nothing to do with broccoli or precedents).

The debate with respect to the right to keep and bear arms, as with other guarantees in the Bill of Rights, was not over whether it was desirable (all agreed that it was) but over whether it needed to be codified in the Constitution. During the 1788 ratification debates, the fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through a standing army or select militia was pervasive in Antifederalist rhetoric. See, e.g., Letters from The Federal Farmer III (Oct. 10, 1787), in 2 The Complete Anti–Federalist 234, 242 (H. Storing ed.1981). John Smilie, for example, worried not only that Congress’s “command of the militia” could be used to create a “select militia,” or to have “no militia at all,” but also, as a separate concern, that “[w]hen a select militia is formed; the people in general may be disarmed.” 2 Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution 508–509 (M. Jensen ed.1976) (hereinafter *599 Documentary Hist.). Federalists responded that because Congress was given no power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, such a force could never oppress the people. See, e.g., A Pennsylvanian III (Feb. 20, 1788), in The Origin of the Second Amendment 275, 276 (D. Young ed., 2d ed.2001) (hereinafter Young); White, To the Citizens of Virginia, Feb. 22, 1788, in id., at 280, 281; A Citizen of America, (Oct. 10, 1787) in id., at 38, 40; Remarks on the Amendments to the federal Constitution, Nov. 7, 1788, in id., at 556. It was understood across the political spectrum that the right helped to secure the ideal of a citizen militia, which might be necessary to oppose an oppressive military force if the constitutional order broke down.

Here, Scalia cites these debates to give meaning to how the Second Amendment was understood–not as evidence of how the Second Amendment was drafted (what we would call legislative history).

What about on pages 603-605? Scalia responds to Stevens’s attempt in his dissent to focus on the drafting history of the Second Amendment.

Justice STEVENS relies on the drafting history of the Second Amendment—the various proposals in the state conventions and the debates in Congress. It is dubious to rely on such history to interpret a text that was widely understood to codify a pre-existing right, rather than to fashion a new one. But even assuming that this legislative history is relevant, Justice STEVENS flatly misreads the historical record.

Over the next several pages, Scalia responds to Stevens’s arguments by citing debates in the state conventions.

Scalia’s opinion is entirely consistent with his retort to Posner:

There’s a difference between considering “legislative history” — a legal term of art referring to the history of the enactment of a given provision, such as committee reports and floor statements and the like — and looking to the history of the time to get an understanding of how terms in a provision were understood.

So is Posner correct when he says:

“Even if I accepted Scalia’s narrow definition of “legislative history” and applied it to his opinion in Heller, I would not be telling a “lie.” For Justice Scalia does discuss the “drafting history” (legislative history in its narrowest sense) of the Second Amendment. See 554 U.S. 598-599, 603-605.”

Well, on pages 598-599 Scalia discusses the original meaning of the Second Amendment. On pages 603-605 Scalia only discusses drafting history in response to Stevens’s dissent. So even by Scalia or Garner’s definition, Posner is wrong. There is just a slight bit of irony that Posner is citing a dictionary, and Garner’s dictionary at that, to define a term (aren’t dictionaries useless to define legal terms?).

Now, on a broader jurisprudential point, the distinction between original meaning, and what can be gleaned from the drafting history (what can be seen as original intent) is very thin. I argued in this article that the divide between Scalia’s majority opinion and Stevens’s dissent was that of original meaning and original intent. Scalia used history to show how terms were understood, and Stevens’s dissent used the drafting history to show what the intent of the framers were. In that article, I also criticized Posner for making similar historical errors.

Randy Barnett made similar points in this Op-Ed.

 Justice Scalia’s opinion is the finest example of what is now called “original public meaning” jurisprudence ever adopted by the Supreme Court. This approach stands in sharp contrast to Justice John Paul Stevens’s dissenting opinion that largely focused on “original intent” – the method that many historians employ to explain away the text of the Second Amendment by placing its words in what they call a “larger context.” Although original-intent jurisprudence was discredited years ago among constitutional law professors, that has not stopped nonoriginalists from using “original intent” – or the original principles “underlying” the text – to negate its original public meaning.

I think Posner’s confusion is jurisprudential, rather than analytical. As someone who rejects originalism, it is no surprise that he takes no care to distinguish between different strands of it, evolution and the doctrine, developments in originalist scholarship, and how it can be used to provide constitutional meaning.

In fact, Stevens actually criticized Scalia for relying on sources to give meaning to the Second Amendment, rather than focusing on the drafting history like he did!

Although it gives short shrift to the drafting history of the Second Amendment, **2837 the Court dwells at length on four other sources: the 17th-century English Bill of Rights; Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England; postenactment commentary on the Second Amendment; and post-Civil War legislative history.28 All of these sources shed only indirect light on the question before us, and in any event offer little support for the Court’s conclusion.29

Now, I think Stevens is correct about the latter two sources, as he notes in Footnote 28, where Stevens wrote:

The Court’s fixation on the last two types of sources is particularly puzzling, since both have the same characteristics as postenactment legislative history, which is generally viewed as the least reliable source of authority for ascertaining the intent of any provision’s drafters.

In Heller, Scalia stated that he relied correctly on post-ratification commentary:

We now address how the Second Amendment was interpreted from immediately after its ratification through the end of the 19th century. Before proceeding, **2805 however, we take issue with Justice STEVENS’ equating of these sources with postenactment legislative history, a comparison that betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of a court’s interpretive task. Seepost, at 2837, n. 28. “Legislative history,” of course, refers to the pre-enactment statements of those who drafted or voted for a law; it is considered persuasive by some, not because they reflect the general understanding of the disputed terms, but because the legislators who heard or read those statements presumably voted with that understanding. Ibid. “Postenactment legislative history,”ibid., a deprecatory contradiction in terms, refers to statements of those who drafted or voted for the law that are made after its enactment and hence could have had no effect on the congressional vote. It most certainly does not refer to the examination of a variety of legal and other sources to determine the public understanding of a legal text in the period after its enactment or ratification. That sort of inquiry is a critical tool of constitutional interpretation. As we will show, virtually all interpreters of the Second Amendment in the century after its enactment interpreted the amendment as we do.

Again, Scalia is consistent in how he defines legislative history, though sources after the enactment of the Second Amendment may provide meaning, but is not original meaning.

As I wrote when I was a 3L for Joyce Malcolm’s class:

Although post-enactment material cannot have any bearing on the meaning of the Second Amendment as drafted by the framers, it still can help paint the picture of original public meaning. The understanding of the term “keep and bear arms” did not dissipate instantly in 1791 when it was ratified. Rather, strong emanations of this understanding pervaded throughout early America thought. As such, statements of law from this period service as strong indicia of reliability, though not dispositive, of the original meaning .   . .  .

This history, from 1215 to the early 19th century paints a very strong picture of keeping and bearing arms, as an individualized right meant to protect liberty. For Justice Stevens to merely focus on the drafting of the Second Amendment in the waning years of the 18th century, at the price of ignoring all that came before it, is unfaithful to the true principles of originalism, and unsurprisingly reveals his skewed and inaccurate version of history.

Not bad.

Of Posner, I wrote:

Judge Posner has some critiques of originalism. But rather than simply critiquing it, he seeks to redefine it. Odd technique. Judge Posner asserts that “originalism without the interpretive theory that the Framers and the ratifiers ‘expected the courts to use in construing  constitutional provisions is faux originalism.’”264 Says who? Posner’s statement in it of itself devolves back into intentionalism, as he speaks of what the ratifiers “expected.” It is also curious that Posner, an avowed Pragmatist who rejects originalism, should be relied on as an expert on how to define the contours of this jurisprudence. . . . .

Rather than focusing on what the original public meaning of the Second Amendment was at the time it was ratified, Judge Posner attempts to ascertain what the “intent” of the Founders was. He is also guilty of relying on some of the seven dirty words of intentionalism.272 He uses words like the “motivation for the Second Amendment,” “concerns that actuated its adoption,” “the purpose of the Second Amendment,” and what the “framers meant.”273 As discussed supra, trying to determine what the motivations, concerns, or intentions of the framers is a futile endeavor.274 Elsewhere Judge Posner ceases using the seven dirty words, switches his vernacular, and adopts the accepted notions of “original meaning” and “original understanding” to conclude his article.275 Whereas his minor premises were conditioned on an “original intent,” even if his conclusion is based on “original meaning,” his syllogism collapses.

Because Judge Posner focuses so heavily on what he considers to be the intentions of the Framers, he fails to consider what the terms in the Second Amendment mean. He mentions the “language and background” of the Second Amendment, but totally glosses over the centuries of common law history, from Magna Carta, to the Game Laws, to the English Bill of Rights, to the disarming of the Bostonians. None of that matters to Judge Posner. Were Posner to fully appreciate the “language and background” of words such as “well regulated militia,” “free state,” and “keep and bear arms,” these terms would take on a whole new meaning. The Second Amendment cannot be interpreted in this historical vacuum Judge Posner creates.

It is fascinating how these jurisprudential debates keep emerging over and over again. The tropes between Scalia and Posner here are old–or at least as old as 2008.

Can you imagine if Reagan had appointed Posner to replace Powell instead of Kennedy? Scalia and Posner, both on the Court? It would have been worse that Frankfurter and Black! You know what? The sures way Obama could get Scalia to retire would be to appoint Posner to the bench!

Print Friendly
  • Michael Krauss

    Josh, this is a good summary. As you well know, we deal with this extensively in my Jurisprudence Seminar. I (perhaps incorrectly?) understand, by the way, that Judge Posner is a registered Democrat; and he is surely more like Justice Breyer in his jurisprudential posture than any other Justice. So the chances of his being appointed during a second Obama administration seem non-trivial to me. Indeed, such chances might to some extent explain his recent outbursts.

    • http://joshblackman.com/ Josh Blackman

      Thank you Michael. You know, I was (as usual) being largely facetious about Posner being appointed to the Supreme Court. That would be a huge spite nomination. And I am certain Republicans would oppose him as vigorously, if not more vigorously, than a Kagan or Sotomayor, in light of his recent disrespect to the patron saint of the Federalist Society.

  • Pingback: Scalia v. Posner, Round XIII: Nino Strikes Back | Josh Blackman's Blog

  • A Democrat

    Posner a Democrat? What are you people smoking in here?

  • Tim Hootman

    I purchased Reading Law with the idea that it would be an impartial exposition of the rules of statutory/constitutional construction that I could resort to as a reference guide. I read the book (every single word and footnote!) to find out that it is an tour de force piece of rhetoric advocating Scalianism. Posner’s critique was entertaining, but its focus on esoteric technicalities of interpretation seems to me to miss the larger problem of the book that it is generally an assault on the overall structure of the constitution’s purpose of furthering larger general principles suggesting that the constitution is therefore a mere codification of particular details. It seems clear that the details of life’s controversies were intended to be worked out within the parameters of the greater principles set by the constitution as particular controversies worked their way into the court system. Scalia, Posner, and the general discussion about the Posner-lied controversy miss this larger and more important point.

    • http://joshblackman.com/ Josh Blackman

      Did you mean Posner-led or Posner-lied. The latter would be an interesting Freudian slip. I still have not had time to read the book but your review seems apt. I always got the sense that J. Posner focused on smaller bits while ignoring the broader thrust of Scalia’s book. Posner’s recent review of Amar’s book focused on small-picture nits as well as big-picture attacks on Amar’s view of the Constitution.

  • http://www.hostsg.com/enterprise-hosting/dedicated-server.php deadmacabre

    Thats incredibly good

  • http://www.carinsurancerates.com/ rooferironboots

    I was being largely facetious about Posner being appointed to the Supreme Cour

  • http://www.lawyersbystate.net/ lawyersbystate

    fabulous

  • http://www.nrl500.com.au/ PennyBrickey

    nice one

  • http://quote44.com/ watergood

    incredible

  • http://quote44.com/ watergood

    Excellent

  • http://www.animedubbedonline.net/ animedubbedonline

    wonderful

  • http://vividrankings.co.uk/ invincible stone

    tremndous

  • http://www.pillowreviews.org/ pouting sherry

    marvelous

  • http://bestprepaid.org/ scrawnyhellish

    Remarkable…!!

  • Geoff Wright

    While I generally agree with this assessment, citing the drafting debates in order to understand the “relationship between the prefatory clause and operative clause” is using legislative history in the ordinary sense. Judges that rely on legislative history generally do so to help find meaning when a statute is somehow ambiguous. Using floor debates to find meaning in the 2nd Amendment’s dual clause structure fits that description.

  • Pingback: Justice Stevens Rehab Tour Chugs Along to Georgia: JPS Still Doesn’t Get Originalism | Josh Blackman's Blog

  • http://www.regaltaxlaw.com/ RegalTaxLaw

    Its phenomenal

  • http://ar-magmagnet.com/ steveazhocar

    Interesting

  • http://guthrieandsons.com/ wesguthrie

    Thats fascinating

  • http://www.creditrepairaid.org/ creditrepairaid

    While I generally agree with this assessment, citing the drafting debates in order to understand the “relationship between the prefatory clause and operative clause” is using legislative history in the ordinary sense.

  • http://www.carinsurancerates.com/ breadpages

    Thats astounding…

  • http://www.carinsurancerates.com/ slicetoupee

    Did you mean Posner-led or Posner-lied. The latter would be an interesting Freudian slip.

  • http://www.mylovepsychic.org/ smallpit

    While I generally agree with this assessment, citing the drafting debates in order to understand the “relationship between the prefatory clause and operative clause” is using legislative history in the ordinary sense.

  • http://www.easyonlinepaydayloan.com/ patterout

    good

  • http://finance.yahoo.com/news/best-houston-home-security-systems-173500766.html spermbug

    Thats excellent…

  • http://www.lactomisr.com louis vuitton outlet cheap

    {
    {I have|I’ve} been {surfing|browsing} online more than {three|3|2|4} hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
    {It’s|It is} pretty worth enough for me. {In my opinion|Personally|In my view},
    if all {webmasters|site owners|website owners|web owners} and
    bloggers made good content as you did, the {internet|net|web} will be {much more|a lot more} useful than ever before.|
    I {couldn’t|could not} {resist|refrain from} commenting.
    {Very well|Perfectly|Well|Exceptionally well} written!|
    {I will|I’ll} {right away|immediately} {take hold of|grab|clutch|grasp|seize|snatch} your {rss|rss
    feed} as I {can not|can’t} {in finding|find|to
    find} your {email|e-mail} subscription {link|hyperlink} or {newsletter|e-newsletter} service.
    Do {you have|you’ve} any? {Please|Kindly} {allow|permit|let} me {realize|recognize|understand|recognise|know} {so
    that|in order that} I {may just|may|could} subscribe. Thanks.|
    {It is|It’s} {appropriate|perfect|the best} time to make some plans
    for the future and {it is|it’s} time to be happy. {I have|I’ve} read this post and if
    I could I {want to|wish to|desire to} suggest you {few|some} interesting things or {advice|suggestions|tips}.
    {Perhaps|Maybe} you {could|can} write next articles referring to this article.

    I {want to|wish to|desire to} read {more|even more} things about it!|
    {It is|It’s} {appropriate|perfect|the best} time to make {a
    few|some} plans for {the future|the longer term|the long run} and {it is|it’s} time to be happy.
    {I have|I’ve} {read|learn} this {post|submit|publish|put up}
    and if I {may just|may|could} I {want to|wish to|desire to} {suggest|recommend|counsel} you {few|some}
    {interesting|fascinating|attention-grabbing} {things|issues} or {advice|suggestions|tips}.
    {Perhaps|Maybe} you {could|can} write {next|subsequent} articles {relating to|referring to|regarding} this article.

    I {want to|wish to|desire to} {read|learn} {more|even more} {things|issues} {approximately|about} it!|
    {I have|I’ve} been {surfing|browsing} {online|on-line} {more
    than|greater than} {three|3} hours {these days|nowadays|today|lately|as of late},
    {yet|but} I {never|by no means} {found|discovered} any {interesting|fascinating|attention-grabbing} article like yours.
    {It’s|It is} {lovely|pretty|beautiful} {worth|value|price} {enough|sufficient}
    for me. {In my opinion|Personally|In my view}, if
    all {webmasters|site owners|website owners|web owners} and bloggers made
    {just right|good|excellent} {content|content material} as {you did|you
    probably did}, the {internet|net|web} {will be|shall be|might be|will probably be|can be|will likely be} {much more|a lot more} {useful|helpful}
    than ever before.|
    Ahaa, its {nice|pleasant|good|fastidious} {discussion|conversation|dialogue} {regarding|concerning|about|on the topic of} this {article|post|piece of writing|paragraph} {here|at this place} at this {blog|weblog|webpage|website|web site}, I have read all that, so {now|at this
    time} me also commenting {here|at this place}.|
    I am sure this {article|post|piece of writing|paragraph}
    has touched all the internet {users|people|viewers|visitors}, its really really {nice|pleasant|good|fastidious} {article|post|piece of writing|paragraph} on building up new {blog|weblog|webpage|website|web
    site}.|
    Wow, this {article|post|piece of writing|paragraph} is {nice|pleasant|good|fastidious},
    my {sister|younger sister} is analyzing {such|these|these kinds of} things, {so|thus|therefore} I
    am going to {tell|inform|let know|convey} her.|
    {Saved as a favorite|bookmarked!!}, {I really like|I like|I love} {your blog|your site|your web site|your
    website}!|
    Way cool! Some {very|extremely} valid points! I appreciate
    you {writing this|penning this} {article|post|write-up} {and the|and also the|plus the} rest of the {site is|website is} {also
    very|extremely|very|also really|really} good.|
    Hi, {I do believe|I do think} {this is an excellent|this is a great} {blog|website|web site|site}.

    I stumbledupon it ;) {I will|I am going to|I’m going to|I may} {come back|return|revisit}
    {once again|yet again} {since I|since i have} {bookmarked|book marked|book-marked|saved as a favorite} it.
    Money and freedom {is the best|is the greatest} way to change,
    may you be rich and continue to {help|guide} {other
    people|others}.|
    Woah! I’m really {loving|enjoying|digging} the template/theme of this {site|website|blog}.

    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s {very hard|very difficult|challenging|tough|difficult|hard}
    to get that “perfect balance” between {superb usability|user friendliness|usability} and {visual appearance|visual
    appeal|appearance}. I must say {that you’ve|you have|you’ve} done a {awesome|amazing|very good|superb|fantastic|excellent|great} job with this.
    {In addition|Additionally|Also}, the blog loads {very|extremely|super} {fast|quick} for me
    on {Safari|Internet explorer|Chrome|Opera|Firefox}. {Superb|Exceptional|Outstanding|Excellent} Blog!|
    These are {really|actually|in fact|truly|genuinely} {great|enormous|impressive|wonderful|fantastic} ideas in {regarding|concerning|about|on the topic of} blogging.
    You have touched some {nice|pleasant|good|fastidious} {points|factors|things} here.
    Any way keep up wrinting.|
    {I love|I really like|I enjoy|I like|Everyone loves} what you
    guys {are|are usually|tend to be} up too. {This sort of|This type of|Such|This kind of} clever work and {exposure|coverage|reporting}!

    Keep up the {superb|terrific|very good|great|good|awesome|fantastic|excellent|amazing|wonderful}
    works guys I’ve {incorporated||added|included} you
    guys to {|my|our||my personal|my own} blogroll.|
    {Howdy|Hi there|Hey there|Hi|Hello|Hey}! Someone in my {Myspace|Facebook} group shared this {site|website} with us so
    I came to {give it a look|look it over|take a look|check it out}.

    I’m definitely {enjoying|loving} the information. I’m
    {book-marking|bookmarking} and will be tweeting this to my followers!
    {Terrific|Wonderful|Great|Fantastic|Outstanding|Exceptional|Superb|Excellent}
    blog and {wonderful|terrific|brilliant|amazing|great|excellent|fantastic|outstanding|superb} {style and design|design and style|design}.|
    {I love|I really like|I enjoy|I like|Everyone loves} what
    you guys {are|are usually|tend to be} up too. {This sort of|This
    type of|Such|This kind of} clever work and {exposure|coverage|reporting}!

    Keep up the {superb|terrific|very good|great|good|awesome|fantastic|excellent|amazing|wonderful} works
    guys I’ve {incorporated|added|included} you guys to {|my|our|my personal|my own} blogroll.|
    {Howdy|Hi there|Hey there|Hi|Hello|Hey} would you mind {stating|sharing} which blog platform you’re {working with|using}?
    I’m {looking|planning|going} to start my own blog {in the near future|soon} but I’m having a {tough|difficult|hard} time {making a decision|selecting|choosing|deciding} between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution
    and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your {design
    and style|design|layout} seems different then most blogs
    and I’m looking for something {completely unique|unique}.
    P.S {My apologies|Apologies|Sorry} for {getting|being}
    off-topic but I had to ask!|
    {Howdy|Hi there|Hi|Hey there|Hello|Hey} would you mind
    letting me know which {webhost|hosting company|web
    host} you’re {utilizing|working with|using}? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 {completely different|different}
    {internet browsers|web browsers|browsers} and I must say this blog loads a lot
    {quicker|faster} then most. Can you {suggest|recommend} a good {internet
    hosting|web hosting|hosting} provider at a {honest|reasonable|fair}
    price? {Thanks a lot|Kudos|Cheers|Thank you|Many thanks|Thanks},
    I appreciate it!|
    {I love|I really like|I like|Everyone loves} it {when people|when individuals|when folks|whenever people} {come together|get
    together} and share {opinions|thoughts|views|ideas}.
    Great {blog|website|site}, {keep it up|continue the good work|stick with it}!|
    Thank you for the {auspicious|good} writeup.

    It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to {far|more} added agreeable
    from you! {By the way|However}, how {can|could} we communicate?|
    {Howdy|Hi there|Hey there|Hello|Hey} just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The {text|words} in your {content|post|article} seem to be running
    off the screen in {Ie|Internet explorer|Chrome|Firefox|Safari|Opera}.

    I’m not sure if this is a {format|formatting} issue or something to do with {web
    browser|internet browser|browser} compatibility but I
    {thought|figured} I’d post to let you know. The {style and design|design and style|layout|design} look great
    though! Hope you get the {problem|issue} {solved|resolved|fixed} soon.

    {Kudos|Cheers|Many thanks|Thanks}|
    This is a topic {that is|that’s|which is} {close to|near to} my heart…
    {Cheers|Many thanks|Best wishes|Take care|Thank
    you}! {Where|Exactly where} are your contact details though?|
    It’s very {easy|simple|trouble-free|straightforward|effortless}
    to find out any {topic|matter} on {net|web} as compared to {books|textbooks},
    as I found this {article|post|piece of writing|paragraph}
    at this {website|web site|site|web page}.|
    Does your {site|website|blog} have a contact page?
    I’m having {a tough time|problems|trouble} locating it but, I’d like to {send|shoot} you
    an {e-mail|email}. I’ve got some {creative ideas|recommendations|suggestions|ideas} for your blog you might be interested in hearing.
    Either way, great {site|website|blog} and I look forward to seeing it {develop|improve|expand|grow} over time.|
    {Hola|Hey there|Hi|Hello|Greetings}! I’ve been {following|reading} your {site|web site|website|weblog|blog} for {a long time|a while|some time} now
    and finally got the {bravery|courage} to go ahead
    and give you a shout out from {New Caney|Kingwood|Huffman|Porter|Houston|Dallas|Austin|Lubbock|Humble|Atascocita} {Tx|Texas}!
    Just wanted to {tell you|mention|say} keep up the {fantastic|excellent|great|good} {job|work}!|
    Greetings from {Idaho|Carolina|Ohio|Colorado|Florida|Los angeles|California}!
    I’m {bored to tears|bored to death|bored} at work so I decided to {check out|browse} your {site|website|blog} on my
    iphone during lunch break. I {enjoy|really like|love} the {knowledge|info|information} you {present|provide} here and
    can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m {shocked|amazed|surprised} at how {quick|fast} your blog loaded on
    my {mobile|cell phone|phone} .. I’m not even using WIFI,
    just 3G .. {Anyhow|Anyways}, {awesome|amazing|very good|superb|good|wonderful|fantastic|excellent|great} {site|blog}!|
    Its {like you|such as you} {read|learn} my {mind|thoughts}!
    You {seem|appear} {to understand|to know|to grasp} {so much|a lot} {approximately|about} this, {like you|such as
    you} wrote the {book|e-book|guide|ebook|e book} in it or something.
    {I think|I feel|I believe} {that you|that you simply|that
    you just} {could|can} do with {some|a few} {%|p.c.|percent} to {force|pressure|drive|power} the message {house|home}
    {a bit|a little bit}, {however|but} {other than|instead of} that,
    {this is|that is} {great|wonderful|fantastic|magnificent|excellent} blog.

    {A great|An excellent|A fantastic} read.
    {I’ll|I will} {definitely|certainly} be back.|
    I visited {multiple|many|several|various} {websites|sites|web sites|web pages|blogs} {but|except|however} the
    audio {quality|feature} for audio songs {current|present|existing} at this {website|web site|site|web
    page} is {really|actually|in fact|truly|genuinely}
    {marvelous|wonderful|excellent|fabulous|superb}.|
    {Howdy|Hi there|Hi|Hello}, i read your blog {occasionally|from time to time} and i own a similar one and
    i was just {wondering|curious} if you get a lot of spam {comments|responses|feedback|remarks}?
    If so how do you {prevent|reduce|stop|protect against} it, any plugin or
    anything you can {advise|suggest|recommend}? I get so
    much lately it’s driving me {mad|insane|crazy} so any {assistance|help|support} is very much appreciated.|
    Greetings! {Very helpful|Very useful} advice {within this|in this particular} {article|post}!
    {It is the|It’s the} little changes {that make|which will make|that produce|that will make}
    {the biggest|the largest|the greatest|the most important|the most significant} changes.
    {Thanks a lot|Thanks|Many thanks} for sharing!|
    {I really|I truly|I seriously|I absolutely} love {your blog|your site|your
    website}.. {Very nice|Excellent|Pleasant|Great} colors & theme.

    Did you {create|develop|make|build} {this website|this site|this web site|this amazing site} yourself?
    Please reply back as I’m {looking to|trying to|planning to|wanting to|hoping
    to|attempting to} create {my own|my very own|my own personal}
    {blog|website|site} and {would like to|want to|would
    love to} {know|learn|find out} where you got this from or {what the|exactly what
    the|just what the} theme {is called|is named}.
    {Thanks|Many thanks|Thank you|Cheers|Appreciate it|Kudos}!|
    {Hi there|Hello there|Howdy}! This {post|article|blog
    post} {couldn’t|could not} be written {any better|much better}!

    {Reading through|Looking at|Going through|Looking through} this {post|article} reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He {always|constantly|continually} kept {talking about|preaching about} this.
    {I will|I’ll|I am going to|I most certainly will} {forward|send} {this article|this information|this post} to him.
    {Pretty sure|Fairly certain} {he will|he’ll|he’s going to} {have a good|have a
    very good|have a great} read. {Thank you for|Thanks for|Many thanks for|I appreciate you
    for} sharing!|
    {Wow|Whoa|Incredible|Amazing}! This blog looks {exactly|just} like my old
    one! It’s on a {completely|entirely|totally} different {topic|subject} but it has pretty much the same {layout|page layout} and design.
    {Excellent|Wonderful|Great|Outstanding|Superb} choice of colors!|
    {There is|There’s} {definately|certainly}
    {a lot to|a great deal to} {know about|learn about|find out about} this {subject|topic|issue}.
    {I like|I love|I really like} {all the|all of the} points {you made|you’ve made|you have
    made}.|
    {You made|You’ve made|You have made} some {decent|good|really good} points there.

    I {looked|checked} {on the internet|on the web|on the net} {for more info|for more information|to find out more|to learn more|for
    additional information} about the issue and found {most individuals|most people} will go along with your views
    on {this website|this site|this web site}.|
    {Hi|Hello|Hi there|What’s up}, I {log on to|check|read} your {new stuff|blogs|blog} {regularly|like every week|daily|on a regular basis}.
    Your {story-telling|writing|humoristic}
    style is {awesome|witty}, keep {doing what you’re doing|up the good work|it up}!|
    I {simply|just} {could not|couldn’t} {leave|depart|go away}
    your {site|web site|website} {prior to|before} suggesting that
    I {really|extremely|actually} {enjoyed|loved}
    {the standard|the usual} {information|info} {a person|an individual} {supply|provide} {for your|on your|in
    your|to your} {visitors|guests}? Is {going to|gonna}
    be {back|again} {frequently|regularly|incessantly|steadily|ceaselessly|often|continuously} {in order to|to} {check up on|check out|inspect|investigate cross-check} new posts|
    {I wanted|I needed|I want to|I need to} to thank you for this {great|excellent|fantastic|wonderful|good|very good} read!!
    I {definitely|certainly|absolutely} {enjoyed|loved} every {little bit of|bit of} it.
    {I have|I’ve got|I have got} you {bookmarked|book marked|book-marked|saved as a favorite} {to check
    out|to look at} new {stuff you|things you} post…|
    {Hi|Hello|Hi there|What’s up}, just wanted to {mention|say|tell you}, I
    {enjoyed|liked|loved} this {article|post|blog post}.
    It was {inspiring|funny|practical|helpful}. Keep on posting!|
    I {{leave|drop|{write|create}} a {comment|leave a response}|drop
    a {comment|leave a response}|{comment|leave a response}}
    {each time|when|whenever} I {appreciate|like|especially enjoy} a {post|article} on a {site|{blog|website}|site|website} or {I
    have|if I have} something to {add|contribute|valuable to contribute} {to the discussion|to the conversation}.
    {It is|Usually it is|Usually it’s|It’s} {a result of|triggered
    by|caused by} the {passion|fire|sincerness} {communicated|displayed} in the {post|article} I {read|looked at|browsed}.
    And {on|after} this {post|article} Scalia v.
    Posner, Rounds XI & XII: Did Posner Lie about Scalia citing legislative history in Heller?

    | Josh Blackman’s Blog. I {{was|was actually} moved|{was|was
    actually} excited} enough to {drop|{leave|drop|{write|create}}|post}
    a {thought|{comment|{comment|leave a response}a
    response}} {:-P|:)|;)|;-)|:-)} I {do have|actually do have} {{some|a few} questions|a couple of questions|2 questions} for you {if you {don’t|do not|usually do not|tend not to}
    mind|if it’s {allright|okay}}. {Is it|Could it be} {just|only|simply}
    me or {do|does it {seem|appear|give the impression|look|look as if|look like} like} {some|a few} of {the|these} {comments|responses|remarks} {look|appear|come across}
    {like they are|as if they are|like} {coming from|written
    by|left by} brain dead {people|visitors|folks|individuals}?
    :-P And, if you are {posting|writing} {on|at} {other|additional} {sites|social sites|online sites|online social sites|places}, {I’d|I would} like to {follow|keep up with} {you|{anything|everything} {new|fresh} you have to post}.
    {Could|Would} you {list|make a list} {all|every one|the complete urls} of {your|all your} {social|communal|community|public|shared} {pages|sites} like your {twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile|linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter
    feed|Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile}?|
    {Hi there|Hello}, I enjoy reading {all of|through} your {article|post|article post}.
    I {like|wanted} to write a little comment to support you.|
    I {always|constantly|every time} spent my half an hour to read
    this {blog|weblog|webpage|website|web site}’s {articles|posts|articles or reviews|content} {everyday|daily|every day|all the time} along with a {cup|mug} of coffee.|
    I {always|for all time|all the time|constantly|every time} emailed this {blog|weblog|webpage|website|web site} post page to all
    my {friends|associates|contacts}, {because|since|as|for the reason that} if like to
    read it {then|after that|next|afterward} my {friends|links|contacts} will too.|
    My {coder|programmer|developer} is trying to {persuade|convince} me
    to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the
    {expenses|costs}. But he’s tryiong none the less.
    I’ve been using {Movable-type|WordPress} on {a number of|a
    variety of|numerous|several|various} websites for about a year and am {nervous|anxious|worried|concerned} about switching to another platform.
    I have heard {fantastic|very good|excellent|great|good} things about blogengine.net.
    Is there a way I can {transfer|import} all my wordpress {content|posts} into it?
    {Any kind of|Any} help would be {really|greatly} appreciated!|
    {Hello|Hi|Hello there|Hi there|Howdy|Good day}! I could have sworn I’ve {been to|visited} {this blog|this
    web site|this website|this site|your blog} before but after {browsing through|going through|looking at} {some of the|a few of the|many of the} {posts|articles} I realized it’s new to
    me. {Anyways|Anyhow|Nonetheless|Regardless}, I’m {definitely|certainly} {happy|pleased|delighted} {I found|I discovered|I came across|I stumbled upon} it and I’ll be {bookmarking|book-marking}
    it and checking back {frequently|regularly|often}!|
    {Terrific|Great|Wonderful} {article|work}! {This is|That is} {the type of|the kind of} {information|info}
    {that are meant to|that are supposed to|that should} be shared {around the|across
    the} {web|internet|net}. {Disgrace|Shame} on {the {seek|search} engines|Google} for {now
    not|not|no longer} positioning this {post|submit|publish|put up} {upper|higher}!
    Come on over and {talk over with|discuss with|seek advice from|visit|consult with} my {site|web site|website} .
    {Thank you|Thanks} =)|
    Heya {i’m|i am} for the first time here. I {came across|found} this board
    and I find It {truly|really} useful & it helped me out {a lot|much}.
    I hope to give something back and {help|aid} others like you
    {helped|aided} me.|
    {Hi|Hello|Hi there|Hello there|Howdy|Greetings}, {I
    think|I believe|I do believe|I do think|There’s no doubt that} {your site|your website|your web site|your blog} {might be|may be|could be|could possibly be} having
    {browser|internet browser|web browser} compatibility {issues|problems}.
    {When I|Whenever I} {look at your|take a look at your}
    {website|web site|site|blog} in Safari, it looks fine {but when|however when|however, if|however,
    when} opening in {Internet Explorer|IE|I.E.},
    {it has|it’s got} some overlapping issues.
    {I just|I simply|I merely} wanted to {give you a|provide you with a}
    quick heads up! {Other than that|Apart from that|Besides
    that|Aside from that}, {fantastic|wonderful|great|excellent} {blog|website|site}!|
    {A person|Someone|Somebody} {necessarily|essentially} {lend a hand|help|assist} to make {seriously|critically|significantly|severely}
    {articles|posts} {I would|I might|I’d} state. {This is|That
    is} the {first|very first} time I frequented your {web page|website page}
    and {to this point|so far|thus far|up to now}? I {amazed|surprised} with the {research|analysis} you made to {create|make} {this actual|this particular} {post|submit|publish|put up} {incredible|amazing|extraordinary}.
    {Great|Wonderful|Fantastic|Magnificent|Excellent} {task|process|activity|job}!|
    Heya {i’m|i am} for {the primary|the first} time here.

    I {came across|found} this board and I {in finding|find|to find} It {truly|really} {useful|helpful} & it helped me out
    {a lot|much}. {I am hoping|I hope|I’m hoping} {to give|to offer|to provide|to present} {something|one thing} {back|again} and {help|aid} others {like you|such as
    you} {helped|aided} me.|
    {Hello|Hi|Hello there|Hi there|Howdy|Good day|Hey there}!
    {I just|I simply} {would like to|want to|wish to} {give you a|offer you a} {huge|big} thumbs
    up {for the|for your} {great|excellent} {info|information} {you have|you’ve got|you have got} {here|right here} on this post.
    {I will be|I’ll be|I am} {coming back to|returning to} {your blog|your site|your website|your web site} for more soon.|
    I {always|all the time|every time} used to {read|study}
    {article|post|piece of writing|paragraph} in news papers but
    now as I am a user of {internet|web|net} {so|thus|therefore}
    from now I am using net for {articles|posts|articles or reviews|content}, thanks to web.|
    Your {way|method|means|mode} of {describing|explaining|telling}
    {everything|all|the whole thing} in this {article|post|piece
    of writing|paragraph} is {really|actually|in fact|truly|genuinely} {nice|pleasant|good|fastidious}, {all|every
    one} {can|be able to|be capable of} {easily|without
    difficulty|effortlessly|simply} {understand|know|be aware of} it, Thanks a lot.|
    {Hi|Hello} there, {I found|I discovered} your {blog|website|web site|site} {by means of|via|by the use of|by way of}
    Google {at the same time as|whilst|even as|while}
    {searching for|looking for} a {similar|comparable|related} {topic|matter|subject}, your {site|web site|website} {got here|came} up,
    it {looks|appears|seems|seems to be|appears to be like} {good|great}.
    {I have|I’ve} bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

    {Hello|Hi} there, {simply|just} {turned into|became|was|become|changed into} {aware of|alert to} your {blog|weblog} {thru|through|via} Google, {and found|and located} that {it
    is|it’s} {really|truly} informative. {I’m|I am} {gonna|going to} {watch out|be careful}
    for brussels. {I will|I’ll} {appreciate|be grateful} {if you|should you|when you|in
    the event you|in case you|for those who|if you happen to} {continue|proceed} this {in future}.
    {A lot of|Lots of|Many|Numerous} {other folks|folks|other people|people} {will be|shall be|might be|will probably be|can be|will likely be} benefited {from your|out of your}
    writing. Cheers!|
    {I am|I’m} curious to find out what blog {system|platform} {you have been|you
    happen to be|you are|you’re} {working with|utilizing|using}?
    I’m {experiencing|having} some {minor|small} security {problems|issues} with my latest {site|website|blog} and {I would|I’d} like to find
    something more {safe|risk-free|safeguarded|secure}. Do you
    have any {solutions|suggestions|recommendations}?|
    {I am|I’m} {extremely|really} impressed with your writing
    skills {and also|as well as} with the layout on
    your {blog|weblog}. Is this a paid theme or did you {customize|modify}
    it yourself? {Either way|Anyway} keep up the
    {nice|excellent} quality writing, {it’s|it is} rare
    to see a {nice|great} blog like this one {these days|nowadays|today}.|
    {I am|I’m} {extremely|really} {inspired|impressed} {with your|together with your|along with your} writing {talents|skills|abilities} {and also|as {smartly|well|neatly} as} with the {layout|format|structure}
    {for your|on your|in your|to your} {blog|weblog}.
    {Is this|Is that this} a paid {subject|topic|subject matter|theme} or did you {customize|modify} it {yourself|your self}?
    {Either way|Anyway} {stay|keep} up the {nice|excellent} {quality|high quality}
    writing, {it’s|it is} {rare|uncommon} {to peer|to see|to
    look} a {nice|great} {blog|weblog} like this one {these days|nowadays|today}..|
    {Hi|Hello}, Neat post. {There is|There’s} {a problem|an issue} {with your|together with your|along with your} {site|web
    site|website} in {internet|web} explorer, {may|might|could|would} {check|test} this?
    IE {still|nonetheless} is the {marketplace|market} {leader|chief} and
    {a large|a good|a big|a huge} {part of|section of|component to|portion of|component of|element of} {other folks|folks|other people|people} will {leave
    out|omit|miss|pass over} your {great|wonderful|fantastic|magnificent|excellent} writing {due
    to|because of} this problem.|
    {I’m|I am} not sure where {you are|you’re} getting your {info|information}, but
    {good|great} topic. I needs to spend some time learning {more|much more} or understanding more.

    Thanks for {great|wonderful|fantastic|magnificent|excellent} {information|info} I was looking for this {information|info} for
    my mission.|
    {Hi|Hello}, i think that i saw you visited my {blog|weblog|website|web site|site} {so|thus} i came to “return the favor”.{I am|I’m} {trying to|attempting to} find
    things to {improve|enhance} my {website|site|web site}!I suppose
    its ok to use {some of|a few of} your ideas!!\

    My web blog: louis vuitton outlet cheap