May 24, 2010

Posted in Uncategorized

NYT Headline Disgusts Me: “Rent Control Is a Vanishing New York Treasure”

Rent control is not a treasure. It is a scourge on the free market.

The New York Times has a puff piece about how this “mythic[al]” program is slowly vanishing from Manhattan.

An informal survey of some major landlords and real estate agencies turned up an Upper East Side woman paying $156.20 for two conjoined studios, a Lower East Side man paying $60 a month for a walk-up and the octogenarians and nonagenarians sprinkled through Little Italy paying $58 to $102 a month

The roster of rent-controlled apartments, the ones with the most restrictions on rent, has shrunk to 40,000, according to the State Division of Housing and Community Renewal. When these units are emptied, they become rent stabilized, and after a certain point the apartments can be liberated to the free market. According to the most recent figures available, the number of rent-stabilized units fell to 848,000 in 2008 from 900,000 in 2003.

Liberated to the free market? Liberated to the free market???? Seriously??? Well, at least this statement implicitly notes that previously, this apartment was enslaved by the welfare state. In that sense, I suppose it is an appropriate locution.

The articles tells the story of one tenant, John Burke, who pays $288 a month for a studio apartment on 218 East 84th Street. Other tenants in his building pay close to $2,000 for a similar apartment.

And despite such a statist boon, this ungrateful tenant is still unhappy. While his landlord renovates other apartments, for obvious reasons, he will not renovate Burke’s apartment.

Mr. Burke says he has spent $13,500 to repair his dilapidated apartment, and $11,000 on legal fees taking his landlords to court over the conditions.

“It’s been hell,” he said while walking among glass shards that construction workers left strewn in the backyard. “Now you see, it’s no bargain.”

He saves almost $2,000 a month on rent. In one year, he saves over $24,000 in rent. That is approximately the same amount he has spent on repair costs and legal fees.  Now consider all of the years he has lived there, and the money  he has saved. And he thinks there is no bargain? Seriously?

Rant over.

Print Friendly
  • Carl Edman

    You should have seen the NYT headline of December 6, 1865: “Constitutional Amendment Banishes Southern Treasure of Inexpensive Workers”

  • Pingback: $288/Month for an Upper East Side Studio | Think Tank West()

  • Dear Mr. Blackman:

  • Dear Mr. Blackman:
    I would like to respond to you and present the facts of this NYT Article that were not included,
    so that you may get a clearer picture and maybe not be so disgusted.
    This gentleman, Mr. Burke lived in his apartment for all those years, without a lease, because for years the previous landlord refused to comply with the law and provide this gentleman with a lease, and because of this the landlord was BARRED by law from collecting annual rent increases, which kept his rent low. It had nothing to do with this gentleman. In addition, there were over a hundred HPD & DOB – RENT IMPAIRING VIOLATIONS on record, both in his apartment and in the building, many that to date, remain uncured, and this also kept his rent low. All the other tenants in that building were driven out of their homes by the substandard conditions and harassed out.
    This man is the only remaining tenant left living in this building, which is described correctly by the NYT reporter as a combat zone. That is why his rent is low. Tenants have a right by law to live peaceably in a clean and safe envirorment.
    I might add that if you google the name of the the present landlords, the Shalom Family, you will see the magnitude of what harm they have inflicted on so many people, and please read what so many politicians and advocacy groups have publically stated about this landlord.
    I hope this clarifies some issues.

  • Pingback: Rent Seeking for Rent Control()